The petitioner submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous as the cause did not survive further. The Court accepted this submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY. THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 3107 OF 2004
Between:
C. Chinna Subba Reddy, Incharge Head Master, Srimitta Malleswara Swamy Oriental High School Pulivendia, Cuddapah District.
...Petitioner
AND
... Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may
be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one In the natwe of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the proceedings in Rc. No. 1432/S3/2003 dt 31-1-2004 and consequential proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in Rc. No. . 5389/B6/2003 dt 7-2-2004 and the proceedings issued bythe 4th respondent in Rc. No. NIL dt 11-2-2004 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 of the Constitution of India apart from contrary to the G.O.Ms. No. 167 dt 9-3-1984 consequently direct the respondents to promote the petitioner as Head Master.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP. NO: 4103 OF 2004}
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the proceedings in Rc. No. 1432/S3/2003 dt 31-1-2004 issued by the 2nd respondent and consequential proceedigns issued by the 3rd respondent in Rc. No. 5389/B6/2003 dt 7-2-2004 and proceedings issued by the 4th respondent in Rc.No. Nill dt 11-2-2004 consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Incharge Head Master.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. E SAMBASIVA PRATAP
Counsel for Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR EDUCATION
Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
The Court made the following:
-w
APHC010520062004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3457]
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 3107/2004
Between:
C. Chinna Subba Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
The Govt Of A P Rep By Secy And 4 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner;
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR EDUCATION
2.GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit thatthecauseinthe Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence,thematterhasbecome infructuous.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.Thereshall be no order as to costs.
2
m
\
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pendinp. if any, shall^stand closed.
Sd/- y.SRi DEVi
//TRUE COPY// ASSISTAN-HREGISTRAR SECTlifrOFFICER
To,
NAP, NF Sec
HIGH COURT
PATED:23/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.3107 of 2004
dismissing the writ petition without costs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives in light of the petitioner's submission that the cause does not survive further?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
C. Chinna Subba Reddy
The Govt of Andhra Pradesh
The Commissioner and Director of School Education
The District Educational Officer, Cuddapah
The Correspondent, S.M.S. Oriental High School
V. Raghava Reddy
HARINATH.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
