Counsel for the petitioner was absent. The court found the petitioner not interested in prosecuting. The writ petition for reduction of pay was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 26708 OF 2003
Between:
CH. Subramanyam, do. F.G.I., Timmancharla, Guntakal, Anantapur District.
... Petitioner
AND
... Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or writ particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ (i) declaring the proceedings No. Vlg.4 (11) 99-Vol. Ill dated 3.1.2001 imposing the punishment of reduction of pay by 3 stages from the pay for a period of 3 years wihtout cumulative effect besides recovery of Rs. 15, 350/in 20
equal monthly instalments imposed by the 3rd respondent is illegal and proceedings No. Vig. 5/9/2002-AP.II dated arbitrary; (ii) declare the 2ncl respondent rejecting the appeal is illegal and 23.3.2002 issued by the arbitrary and consequently set aside the punishmentimposedwithfurther direction to refund the amounts recovered of Rs. 15,350/-.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K UDAYA SRI
Counsel for Respondents: None Appeared
The Court made the following: Order
APHC010179032003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3457]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 26708/2003
Between;
Ch. Subramanyam
...PETITIONER
AND
Food Corporation Of India 2 Others and Others
...RESPONDENT{S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.KUDAYASRI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
2..
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Today, none represented for the petitioner. On 12.08.2024also,thereis no representation for the petitioner.
prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
2
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shallstandclosed.
Sd/- U SRI DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
' SECTION OFFICER
To,
NAP, NF Sec
tr
HIGH COURT DATED:22/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.26708 of 2003
ANOS^
i 2 0 FEB 2025
^ . Current Section , I
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.
Ch. Subramanyam
Food Corporation Of India
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
