Writ petition challenging a Minimum Wages Act authority's order; counsel submitted the cause did not survive. The High Court recorded the submission and closed the writ petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR .
/ PRESENT ■pfE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 30641 OF 2010 /
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order dt. 26-8-2010 made in MWMP.No. 1/2010 on
the file of the Authority appointed under section 20 of the Minimum wages act 1948 and joint commissioner Labour visakhapatnam, and quash the same<^ as being contrary to law. without jurisdiction and invalid and allow the claim of the petitioner
l-A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 39008 OF 9n>tn|
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to grant interim direction to the Respondents 1 and 2 to pay minimum basic wages of Rs. 4.264/- payabie to the Mechanic Operator along with other cost of living allowance and other allowances to the petitioner as revised in the finai notification published in G.O.Ms.No. 117, LabourEmployment, Training and Factories ( Labour II ) Deparment dated 7.12.2007 forthwith pending disposal of the writ petition /
l-A. NO: 1 OF 2012fWPMP NO: 3670.4 OF
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing of the above Writ Petition ^ —
Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI. A G SATYANARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LABOUR
Counsel for the Respondents: A V S LAXMI
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010603052010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3457]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY .THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 30641/2010
Between;
Jelli Venkata Ramana, Visakhapatnam ...PETITIONER
AND
The Plant Manger Indus Dept Hyd 2 Othrs and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
TAG SATYANARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
TGP FOR LABOUR
2.A VS LAXMI
The Court made the following: ORDER;
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the Writ Petition may be closed.
Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner,
this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
/
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shal>standcIdrpH
//TRUE COPY//
SDI- K. KASIRAO ACHARi ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
To.
VSN
VSN
HIGH COURT
HN,J
DATED;23/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.30641 of 2010
0« MAR 2025 | Current Section . ^
CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jelli Venkata Ramana
The Plant Manager, M/s. SICGIL India Ltd.
Sri F.Dada Bhoy, Mg. Director, SICGIL India Ltd.
The Authority under Minimum Wages Act & Joint Commissioner of Labour, Visakhapatnam
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
