A writ petition challenging rejection of an ex-employee's appeal and seeking reinstatement as Moulder was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on two consecutive dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST ^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
o
PRESENT c
V
■, I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 27079 OF 2003
Between:
Rao, S/o. P. Veera Swamy, Aged about 52 Years, Occ Ex-Moulder Of Koneru Lakshmaiah Engineering College, Vaddeswaram Kunchenapalli, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District, R/o. H.No 42-2/1-95/2 Devi Nagar, Near Ramakrishnapuram, Vijayawada-3. ...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to Memo.No.E4/18136/2002, Dated 17-9-2003 passed by the 1^‘ respondent, rejecting the Appeal filed by the petitioner and to quash the same by declaring it as bad, ilelgal, arbitrary, discriminatory, and contrary to Section 83 of the A.P. Education Act and violates principles of Natural justice besides of ends of offends Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the 2 nd ^ respondent to re-instate the petitioner as Moulder in the 2"" respondent College with all consequential benefits such as continuity of service, backwages, increments, etc.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2003fWPMP. NO: 34294 OF 2003)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased fix an early date for hearing of the writ petition.
I
r.A^ NO!f Y 5f 2Q06fWPMP. NO: 23995 OF 20061
Petition\ under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircunnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtniaybe pleased to pass orders fixing an early date for hearing of the mam writ petition in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. JAYANAND
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR EDUCATION
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI B ADINARAYANARAO,Sr. Counsel
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
APHC010947002003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH 0*0 AT AMARAVATI [3457] 0^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
1 {
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N \A/RIT PFTITION NO: 27079/2003
BETWEEN: ...PETITIONER P.SAMBASIVA RAO
AND
THE COMMISSIONER ANOTHER AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.J JAYANAND
Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.GP FOR EDUCATION 2.B ADINARAYANA RAO
The Court made the following Order:
There was no representation for the petitioner on 12.08.2024. The matter was then posted to 22.08.2024, under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
Today, there is still no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the present writ petition is dismissed for Non-prosecutio n. There shall be no order as to costs. /
i.'N
1
2
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall
1
To,
stand closed.
SOI- N NAGAMMA assistant registrar
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
JAYANAND, Advocate [OPUC] 1. OneCCtoSRU 2. Two CCS to GP FOR EDUCATIONHighCourtof AndhraPradesh
VSR
<br>
m.
HIGH COURT
f ,
VSR
1
DATED:22/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.27079 of 2003
VOX 0 6 FEB 2025 J
. Current Section ^
DISMISSING THE W.P.
WITHOUT COST.
P. Sambasiva Rao
The Commissioner of Technical Education, A.P.
Koneru Lakshmaiah Engineering College, Vaddeswaram
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
