Writ petition against the State of Andhra Pradesh; counsel stated the cause did not survive adjudication, and the court dismissed the petition as infructuous, closing pending miscellaneous petitions.
None; writ petition dismissed as infructuous and miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
::1::
APHC010123502016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3329]
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 16241/2016
Between:
Singiri Shashank
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.PILLIX LAW FIRM
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous.
::2::
In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ
petition shall stand closed.
________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
Dt:20.11.2024 krk
::3::
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO:16241/2016
20.11.2024 krk
Singiri Shashank
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
