Writ petition seeking admission to medical entrance examinations under SC (Bariki) category pending issuance of a caste certificate. Counsel stated the cause no longer survives for adjudication; the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14359 OF 2014
Between:
G. Chinmayi, D/o. G. Lokendranath, Aged 17 years, Occ: Student, Rep. by her father G. Lokendranath, S/o. Late G. Jammanna, Aged 60 years, R/o.D.No.52/24 (Old), D.No.65/54 (New), Fort, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus declaring theactionofthe2nd respondent in not intimating the respondents 5 to 8underRule19ofA.P. (SCs, STs and BC) Issue of Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificates Rules 1997 to allow/admit the petitioner's daughter for the entrance exarriinations under S.C. (Bariki) categoryscheduledtobeheldon 11.05.2014, 22.05.2014, 01.06.2014 and 08.06.2014 respectively is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents5to8toadmit/allow the petitioner's daughter namely G. Chinmayi under S.C.Category for M.B.B.S. course.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 17859 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 5 to 8 i.e., 1) The Executive Secretary, COMEDK 2014, No.132, 2nd floor, 17th Cross, 11th Main, Malleswaram, Bangalore-560P55, Karnataka State, entrance exam scheduled on 11.05.2014, 2)The Convener (examinations), EAMCET 2014, EAMCET - 2014 Office Examinations building Ground floor, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU), Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500 085, A.P., entrance exam scheduled on 22.05.2014, 3) The Assistant Controller of Examinations, Examination Section, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110608, entrance exam scheduled on 01.06.2014 and 4) The Director, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER), Dhanavantri Nagar, Puduchery-
605006 (Pondichery), entrance .exam scheduled on 08.06.2014 to admit/allow the petitioner's daughter namely G. Chinmayi under S.C.Category to the above stated entrance examinations forthwith pending issuance of S.C. (Bariki) caste certificate pending disposal of the above writ petition.
I.A. NO: 2 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 18920 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 6th respondent to declare the results of the petitioners daughter namely G.Chinmayi of EAMCET 20414 held on 22-05-2014 under SC., Category, pending disposal of the Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 8:-
The Court made the following order:
::1::
APHC010021982014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3329] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUE SDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
\
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14359/2014
Between:
G. Chinmayi,
...PETITIONER
AND
The Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Sri S. Mahendra, learned counsel representing Sri N.Aswartha
Narayana, learned counsel for the Petitioner submitsthatthecause
in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudicationand
hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous.
::2::
In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pendinginthe
writ petition shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- P.U.V BHASKARA RAO ASSISJANpREGISTRAR
SECTI^ OFFICER
To,
[OUT]
GSC
A
HIGH COURT
DATED:19/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.14359of2014
DISMISS NG OF THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
G. Chinmayi
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
The District Collector & District Magistrate, Kurnool
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool
The Tahsildar, Kurnool
The Executive Secretary, COMED-K 2014
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
