A 1-2 line order closing a contempt case after the petitioner submitted that the respondents had complied with prior orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 719 OF 2024
Contempt case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to Punish the Respondents herein for willfully Violating and disobeying the Order of the High Court dated 16.11.2023 in WP.No 24518 of 2023
Between:
AKKIREDDYGARI VANNAREDDY, S/o. Akkireddygari Ranganna, aged about 50 years, R/o. Yarragunta Village. Kanekal Mandal, Ananthapur District, A.P.
...PETITIONER
AND
...CONTEMNORS
7
/ / / /
//
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1&4: SRI. S SIVA KUMARI
Counsel for the Responden No,2:SRI. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
The Court made the following: ORDER
w
APHC010060782024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH SEE AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3329]
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 719/2024
Between:
Akkireddygari Vannareddy and Others
...PETITIONER{S)
AND
Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner{S):
1.SRINIVASA RAO NARRA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2.S SIVA KUMARI
The Court made the following:
i
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO:719/2024
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwillfuldisobedience of the orders dated 16.11.2023 passed by this CourtinW.P.No.24518of2023.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learnedcounselforthe respondents.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counselforthepetitioner submits that the respondents have complied with theordersdated16.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.24518 of 2023 and hence,nofurtherordersare required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case isclosed, granting liberty to the petitioner for initiating separate proceedingsforfurtherclaim, if any. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pendinginthecontempt case shall stand closed.
SDI- B PRAS AD A RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
/
ns
N
HIGH COURT
DATED:20/11/2024
ORDER
CC.No.719 of 2024
S 2 8 FEB 2025
o>,
. Current Section . ^
S5fc£ffSPATCH^
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
Akkireddygari Vannareddy
Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar
Sri Shamsher Singh Rawat
Sri.M.Gowthami
Sri. Narayana Naik
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
