The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the contempt petition as it was filed against respondents who had allegedly complied with a prior order dated 08.12.2023. The Court closed the case without making any order on costs.
The contempt case was closed and the petition was dismissed without any specific relief granted to the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVA
TUESDAY ,THE NINETEENTHDAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADdK
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 835 OF 2024
Contempt case U/s.10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to Punish the Respondents herein for wilfully violating, disobeying the orders of the High Court dated 08/12/2023 in WP No. 17552 of 2023
Between:
V VINAY KUMAR, S/o. Veluru Rangaiah, Aged about 31 years, Occ Cultivator, R/o. 3-28, T Kothapalli Village, Yadiki Mandal, Anantapur District, Pincode 515455.
...PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4
Counsel for the Petitioner
:SRI BATHALA RAMESH
Counsel for the Respondents: SMT S SIVA KUMARI
The Court made the following ORDER :
M
APHC010063982024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3329]
TUESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 835/2024
Between:
VVinay Kumar
...PETITIONER
AND
Shashi Bhushan Kumar las and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.SSIVAKUMARI
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 835/2024
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondentsforwillfuldisobedience of the orders dated 08.12.2023 passed by this CourtinW.P.No.17552of2023.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counselforthepetitioner submits that the respondents have complied with theordersdated08.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.17552 of 2023, and hence,nofurtherordersare required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case isclosed.Noorderas to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt
case shall stand closed.
SDI- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
TAC
HIGH COURT
DATED:19/11/2024
ORDER
CC.No.835 of 2024
t (i2APiim f
s.^ . Currem oecuon
spatcva^^ -
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt case needs disposal as the respondents have complied with the impugned orders.
Whether an order as to costs is required in view of compliance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V Vinay Kumar
Shashi Bhushan Kumar IAS
Sri Shamsheer Singh Rawat
Sri S Rajasekar
Sri M Abdus Sami
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
