Dismissed

S.S.T. Minerals, rep. by its Proprietor v. The Secretary of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Nov 2024WP/11842/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses Writ Petition No. 11842/2015 as infructuous. The petitioner was granted leave to file a writ petition regarding alleged illegal interference with transportation of Blue Metal jelly by respondents. The petitioner announced the cause no longer survives, leading to dismissal without costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

S.S.T. Minerals, rep. by its Proprietor Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

I V a

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATk^

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON’BLE DR jTiSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 11842 OF 2015

¶7

Between:^

¶8

S.S.T. Minerals, rep. by its Proprietor, Thiru S. Ranjith Kumar, Aged about 40 years, Occ; Business, D.No.321/12, Amirthi Road, Chitted, Vellore, Tamil Nadu.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The Secretary of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal, Secr^ry,

¶12

Industries and Commerce Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Director (Vigilance and Enforcement), A.P. O/o.^TheDirector General Vigilance and Enforcement, BRKR Building, 9th^Floor,Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad.

¶14

The Regional Vigilance and Enforcement Officer, Nellore, Nellore District.

¶15

The Regional Vigilance and Enforcement Officer, Tirupati, Chittoor District.

¶16

The Deputy Director of Mines and Geology, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District.

¶17

The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Chittoor, Chittoor District ...RESPONDENT^

¶18

Petition under Article 226"^f the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under article 226 of the Constitution of India

¶19

¶20

€

¶21

declaring the action of respondents 2 to 6 in interfering the transportation 4of Blue Metal jelly of petitioner from Vellore to Nellore without following any procedure known to law as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 19, 21 of . - Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in transportation of Blue Metal jelly.

¶22

LA. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 15640 OF 2Q1fi1

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in transportation of Blue Metal jelly from Vellore to Nellore, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner.SRI SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALA^^A Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR VIGILANCE Counsel for the Respondents No.5,6: GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

¶27

APHC010009302019

¶28

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶29

[3310]

¶30

FRIDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶31

PRESENT

¶32

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶33

WRIT PETITION NO: 11842/2015

¶34

Between:

¶35

S.s.t. Minerals, Rep. By Its Proprietor ...PETITIONER

¶36

AND

¶37

The Secretary Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal ...RESPONDENT(S) and Others

¶38

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶39

1.SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA

¶40

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶41

1.GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY (AP)

¶42

The Court made the following Order:

¶43

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits^{that,thecausein} the present writ petition does not survive, and it^{hasbecomeinfructuous.}

¶44

Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as Infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand

¶49

closed.

¶50

//TRUE COPY//

¶51

Sd/- M PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

¶52

To,

¶53

OneCCto SRI. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA, Advocate

¶54

[OPUC]

¶55

Two CCS to GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY, High Court^{of Andhra} Pradesh. [OUT] ^

¶56

Two CCS to GP FOR VIGILANCE, High Court of Andhra^Pradesh.

¶57

[OUT]

¶58

Three C.D.Copies

¶59

¶60

HIGH COURT DATED:08/11/2024

¶61

ORDER

¶62

WP.No.11842 of 2015

¶63

'S 13 MAY 2025
a^ . Current Section ^
Si0E3PATCV5^<^

¶64

DISMISING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

S.S.T. Minerals, rep. by its Proprietor v. The Secretary of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

S.S.T. Minerals, rep. by its Proprietor v. The Secretary of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bommireddy Rami Reddy Vs The Commissioner for Co-operation and The Registrar of Co-operative Societies

Nandi Security and House Keeping Services Vs Commissioner

C. Rajeswaramma, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

D Trimurthulu Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt Gowravarapu Koteswaramma, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Kuraba Laleppa, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh