Writ petition challenging a co-operative society's resolution suspending the petitioner from the post of Chief Executive Officer. Counsel submitted the cause did not survive and the petition had become infructuous; the court dismissed it as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 669 OF 2021
Between:
Bommireddy Rami Reddy, S/o. B. Thirupam Reddy, Hindu, Male, aged about 58 years, Worked as Chief Executive Officer to the 4'^ Respondent Society, Residing at H. No. 28/759-LA3-2, Near Municipal High School, NGO's Colony! Nandyala Town, Kurnool District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4**^ Respondent Society by suspending the petitionervideitsresolution No 2 dated.26-10-2020 and consequential proceedingsdated26-10-2020 issued by the president of the 4**^ respondent society about the suspension of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative
Societies Act. 1964, rules framed thereunder and also offends the Articles 14, and 21 of the Indian Constitution.
\A NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the resolution No 2 dated 26-10-2020 passed by the 4'^ respondent society and consequential proceedings dated 26-10-2020 issued by the president of the 4 th respondent society about the suspension of the petitioner pending disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GANTA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010009152021
[3310]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 669/2021
Between:
Bommireddy Rami Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
The Commissioner For Cooperation And The Registrar ...RESPONDENT(S) Of Cooperative Societies and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.GANTA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.KOTESWARA RAO MUMMANENI
2.GP FOR COOPERATION
The Court made the following:
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr Ganta Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition isdismissed
as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- A VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION'OFFICER
To.
Cnr
HIGH COURT
DATED:07/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.669 of 2021
'x 0 9 MAY 2025 f
^ Current Secwon ^
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCUTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bommireddy Rami Reddy
The Commissioner for Co-operation and The Registrar of Co-operative Societies
The District Co-operative Officer, Kurnool District
The Divisional Co-operative Officer, Nandyala Division, Kurnool District
The Paramatur Farmers Service Co-operative Society Ltd.
K. Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
