Writ petition filed to challenge a tender notice for security guards as illegal and arbitrary, seeking quashing and finalization of earlier bids, was dismissed by the High Court as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
<br>
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI^
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT V.-"'
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 28809 OF 2014 ^
Between;
Nandi Security and House Keeping Services, (Regd.No.6516)No. 15/81 B.P.Agraharam, Srikalahasthi, Chittoor District rep. by its Proprietor P.Muneiah
.*
...PETITIONER ^
AND
...RESPONDENT^
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to Declaring the acti^ of the 2nd Respondentinissuinga Notice in File/NIT No.H2/2476/2013 cailing for the tenders from the Contractus for procurement of Suppiy of Security Guardsfrom 1-10-2014 to 31-03-2014 be declared as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India without finalising the earlier Tenders filed by the Bidders in pursuance to without finalising the earlier Tenders filed by the Bidders in pursuance to the Tender No.H2/2476/2013 and consequently direct the Respondents to finalise the Bids filed by the Tenders in pursuance to the Tender No.H2/2476/2013 for supply of Security Guards for a the year 2014-2015^
¥
w~7
I'pv'-
LA..NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. MQ; ssnfil riF
/
4:
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the finalisation of Tender Process in pursuance to the File/NIT NO.H2/2476/2013 of the 2nd Respondent for supply of Security Guards for the period from 1-10-2014 to 31-03-2014 pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner.SRI SRINIVAS POLAVARAPU Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENDOWMENT^^ Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI V T IVI PRASAD
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010168612014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3310]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 28809/2014
Between:
Nandi Security And House Keeping Services
...PETITIONER
AND
Commissioner and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SRINIVAS POLAVARAPU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.G RAMANA RAO (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS RAYALASEEMAREGION) 2.VTM PRASAD
3.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP)
The Court made the following Order:
, Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.E.Subramanyam learned counsel representing Mr.Srinivas Polavarapu,learnedcounselforthe petitioner, who appeared virtually through video conferencing,submitsthat, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive,and it has become infructuous.
2
/ /
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition isdismissed as
Infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
- As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, ifany, shall stand
closed.
Sd/- M PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To
nm
HIGH COURT DATED:07/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.28809 of 2014
s’ tJ APR 2025 I
^ . Curreot Section ^
X^SPATO^^
DISMISING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
NANDI SECURITY AND HOUSE KEEPING SERVICES
COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF A.P.
SRICALAHASTHISWARA DEVASTHANAM
K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
