This criminal petition seeking to quash an FIR was dismissed for default. The petitioner failed to appear on the hearing dates despite prior notices and adjournments, causing the court to conclude there was no interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.4952 of 2018
Between:
...Petitioners/
Accused Nos.2 & 3 in Crime No.12/2017
AND
...Respondent
...Respondent/Defacto-Complainant
Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR in CrimeNo.theFIRNo.
12/2017 dated 22.12.2017 of P.S. CIDAP, Amaravathi, Mangalagiri registered under Section 406, 409, 420, 468, 120(B)RA/V34IPC.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that inthecircumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including causing arrest of the petitioners in Crime No. the FIR No. 12/2017 dated 22.12.2017 of P.S. CIDAP, Amaravathi, Mangalagiri registered under Section 406, 409, 420, 468, 120(B) R/W 34 IPC, during the pendency of theabovereferredcriminal petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Dishit Bhattacharjee, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
N
1
APHC010325902018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3333]
MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4952/2018
Between:
Kanakeswarudu and others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Others
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.DISHIT BHATTACHARJEE
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash theF.I.R.No.12/2017on the file of the CIDAP, Amaravathi, Mangalgiri.
2
representation on behalf of the counsel for the petitioners. Therefore, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Though the matter was posted today under the caption “for dismissal”, none appeared for the petitioners.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in the Criminal Petition, shall stand closed.
SDI- P VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To
SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED: 19/08/2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.4952 of 2018
o
!|3r 2 6 OCT 2m m!;
AO
Current Section rv/
PATC
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION FOR DEFAULT
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kanakeswarudu and others
State of Andhra Pradesh
V.Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
