Today when the writ petition came up for hearing, learnedcounsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 12.08.2024 by duly enclosing a letter dated 05.08.2024 addressed by petitioner Nos.4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22; wherein it is stated that out of 22 petitioners, petitioner No.1, 2, 7, 20 and 21 are not working, 11*^ petitioner has passed away and that the petitioner Nos.3, 8, 12 and 15 have already withdrawn the writ petition on 18.04.2017. It is further stated that the remaining 12 petitioners are in service without any interruption and are pursuing their request for regularization of service along with other employees. Hence, requested to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the remedies with regard to their regularization of employment. It can be seen that the petitioner Nos.1, 2, 7, 20 and 21 are not working in the 2"'^ respondent organization and the 11*^ petitioner herein has passed away. As such, this Court is of the opinion that the cause in the writ petition would not survive in so far as the petitioner Nos.1, 2, 7, 11, 20 and 21 are concerned. However, as petitioner Nos.4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 22 have already filed a memo dated 12.08.2024 requestingtowithdraw the writ petition, they are at liberty to pursue the remedies for regularization of their employment.
