This judgment dismisses Writ Petition No. 30086 of 2015, filed against the APSRTC, for default. No appearance was made by the petitioner on the stipulated dates, leading the court to conclude there was no ongoing interest in the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
y <
-4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 30086 OF 2015
Between:
A.Basheer, Ananthapur Dist, S/o. Abdulla Sab, Aged 57 years, Driver E.No. 99288, R/o. Hindupur, Anantapur District.
...PETITIONER
; AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the 1st Respondent and issue
appropriate writ, order or direction particularly onein the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders passed by the the 4th respondent in proceedings No. 01/83(01)/2013-HDP, dt. 20.10.2014 and 19.08.2015 and confirmed by the 3rd respondent by order dt. 27.05.2015 and alos -7 -•»* ■■ imposing the punishment of deferment of annual increments for a period of ■ two years without cumulative effect as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, arbitrary, discriminatroy, in violation of principles of natural justice, unfair labour practice and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and grant all consequential benefits in the interest of justice as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
l-A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 38934 OF 20151
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order passed by the 4th respondent in proceedings No. 01/83(01)/2013-HDP, dt. 20.10.2014 and 19.08.2015 by directing not to recover any amount form the petitioner's salary forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWVMP. NO: 2924 OF 20161
...PETITIONERS
A.Basheer, Ananthapur Dist, S/o. Abdulla Sab, Aged 57 years, Driver, E.No. 99288, R/o. Hindupur, Anantapur District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 16.09.2015 in W.P.M.P.No. 38934 of 2015 in W.P. No. 30086 of 2015.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: K VISWANATHAM (SC FOR APSRTC)
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010124952015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3333]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 30086/2015
Between:
A.basheer, Ananthapur Dist
...PETITIONER
AND
M D Apsrtc Hyd 3 Ot and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1 .A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
At the time when the matter was taken on 02.08.2024,therewasno behalf of the petitioner and the matter was posted to representation on 09.08.2024. Even on 09.08.2024, when the matter wascalled,therewasno representation and the matter was posted to 14,08.2024,underthecaption For Dismissal”.
listed today under the caption “For Dismissal Though the matter was is not evincing none appeared for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner any interest in the present case.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for default.Nocosts.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any,shallstandclosed. SD/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
GSC
,
HIGH COURT
DATED:14/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.30086 of 2015
:s6
'f3: 0 7 MAR 2C:5 Ri
^ Current Section ^
f' »-A
.,• /<i*' '■*
DISMISSING THE WP FOR DEFAULT
WITHOUT COSTS
A. Basheer
A.P. State Road Transport Corporation
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
