High Court devoid of understanding quash proceedings Criminal PP failed to appear twice Adjourned posted dismissal default quash proceedings dismissed default no representation conduct petitioner interest present petition accordingly.
Criminal Petition dismissed for default due to absence of petitioner's representation on two adjourned dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2619 OF 2018
Between:
Fayaz, S/o M.Abdul Azeez, Aged 39 years, Occ: Business,R/o.H.No.21- 224-27, SKD Colony,O Road,Adoni Town,Kurnool District.
...Petitioner/Accused
AND
...Respondent/Defacto Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition the High Court may be pleased to quash the C.C.No.261 OF 2015 on the file of Judicial Second Class Magistrate, Adoni, Kurnool District.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.261 OF 2015 on the file of Judicial Second Class Magistrate, Adoni, Kurnool District including appearance of the petitioner.
C.C.No.261 OF 2015 on the file of Judicial Second Class Magistrate Adoni, Kurnool District including appearance of the petitioner.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusingtheMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S M Rafee- no representation, Advocate for the Petitionerand the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following:
APHC010159212018
[3333]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2619/2018
Between:
Fayaz,
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
State of Andhra Pradesh and others
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.S M RAFEE
Counsel for the Respondents/complainant;
The Court made the following;
ORDER:
The Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash theproceedings in C.C.No.261 of 2015, on the file of Judicial II ClassMagistrate,Adoni,Kurnool District.
2
the matter was adjourned to 13.08.2024. Even on 13.08.2024,therewasno representation on behalf of the counsel for the petitioner.Therefore, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption“fordismissal”.Thoughthe matter was posted today under the caption “for dismissal”,noneappearedfor the petitioner.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in the Criminal Petition, shall stand closed.
/
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/-M.SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Ik
SECTION OFFICER
To,
- One CC to Sri. S M Rafee, Advocate [OPUC]
- Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of AndhraPradeshat Amaravathi [OUT
5. Two CD Copies
Stu
PSR
HIGH COURT
DATED:19/08/2024
ORDER
CRLP.No.2619 of 2018
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION FOR DEFAULT
Fayaz
State of Andhra Pradesh
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
