Petitioner challenged seizure of auto rickshaw and stock. Court was informed 6A proceedings were pending. Court directed 2nd respondent to conclude 6A proceedings within two months and disposed the writ petition.
Directed 2nd respondent to conclude 6A proceedings within two months from receipt of copy of order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.38059 of 2015
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in seizing the Auto Rikshaw No.AP 21 TY 3454 along with rice by conducting panchanama dated 05.11.2015 as illegal and arbitrary.
2
the provisions of 6A of Essential Commodities Act as expeditiously as possible within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The
With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
_____________________ JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
14.12.2021 CSR
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. GANGA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.38059 of 2015
14.12.2021
CSR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the seizure of auto rickshaw and rice should be disposed of by directing expeditious conclusion of pending 6A proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Responseents
M. Ganga Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
