PIL seeking removal of illegal encroachment over village land was disposed of as the state confirmed removal of encroachment with spot memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 143 of 2026
Vinay Kumar Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pranjal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
March 12, 2026
Ram.
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether illegal encroachment over village land measuring 0.0590 hectares needs removal?
Vinay Kumar Singh
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 7 Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
