Nagma Hayat vs Km. Chainawati — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Dismissed

Nagma Hayat v. Km. Chainawati

Allahabad HC12 Mar 2026A227/832/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition not pressed as it was unsigned; dismissed with liberty to file a fresh signed petition supported by affidavit; certified copies returned.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file a fresh petition with petitioner's signature and affidavit.

What the court decided

AI extract

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 832 of 2026

Nagma Hayat

.....Petitioner(s)

	Versus
Km. Chainawati			.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Samarth Saxena, Parth Srivastava :	Amritesh	Kumar Tripathi,

Court No. - 17

HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

Heard Shri Samarth Saxena, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the present petition as the petition has not been signed by the petitioner- Nagma Hayat with liberty to file fresh petition with signatures of the petitioner, supported by her affidavit.

Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty.

Let the certified copies annexed with the petition be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining their photocopies on record.