Disposed¶17

Sandeep Kumar Prajapati v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC11 May 2026NA529/2378/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. 2378 of 2026; Sandeep Kumar Prajapati v. State of U.P.; speedy trial / expeditious disposal; direction to trial court; charge framing delayed since 19.05.2025 due to absence of accused; Case No. 811 of 2023; Case Crime No. 74 of 2023; Sections 406, 504 & 506 IPC; Police Station Kerakat, District Jaunpur; ACJM-3rd Jaunpur; six-month timeline; no unnecessary adjournments; Prashant Mishra-I, J.; decided May 12, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court (Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-3rd, Jaunpur) to secure the presence of the accused and decide Case No. 811 of 2023 expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. ¶17

Sandeep Kumar Prajapati Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2378 of 2026

¶2

Sandeep Kumar Prajapati

¶3

.....Applicant(s)

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of U.P. And 2 Others

¶6

.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Harish Kumar Srivastava, Kumar Ankit Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 84

¶8

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶9

Heard Mr. Kumar Ankit Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. representing the State and perused the record.

¶10

The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer for expeditious disposal of Case No. 811 of 2023 (State Vs. Harishchandra Prajapati and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 74 of 2023, under Sections 406, 504 & 506 of I.P.C., Police Station Kerakat, District Jaunpur, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-3^rd , Jaunpur, within stipulated time.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that proceedings of Case Crime No. 74 of 2023 has come to stand still as the case is fixed for charge since 19.05.2025 and till date, it could not be framed on account of absence of accused on the date fixed. Learned counsel for the applicant also apprised that the interest of informant-applicant is adversely being prejudiced in view of the prolonged procedure. He has further prayed to expedite the proceedings.

¶12

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the innocuous prayer of the applicant.

¶13

In view of the above, it is directed that the learned trial court concerned shall make all endeavours to secure the presence of accused and it is also directed to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably withing a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties,

¶14

NA529 No. 2378 of 2026

¶15

¶16

if there is no legal impediment.

¶17