Disposed¶13

Shahzad Rahman v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC12 May 2026NA529/2375/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expeditious trial direction under S. 529 BNSS; Allahabad High Court directs Additional Civil Judge Senior Division-7th, Ghaziabad to conclude Case No. 1522 of 2024 (Case Crime No. 53 of 2024, Sections 323, 504 & 506 IPC, P.S. Link Road) preferably within one year and to frame charges without unnecessary delay or adjournment; application disposed of on May 12, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of with directions to the trial court to decide Case No. 1522 of 2024 expeditiously, preferably within one year from production of a certified copy of the order, and to frame charges without unnecessary delay or adjournments, absent any legal impediment. ¶13

Shahzad Rahman vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2375 of 2026

Shahzad Rahman

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 2 Others	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Lavkush Yadav, Nikil Pathak
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 84

¶7

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶8

Heard Mr. Nikil Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. representing the State and perused the record.

¶9

The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer for expeditious disposal of Case No. 1522 of 2024 (State Vs. Mohd. Shamshad and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 53 of 2024, under Sections 323, 504 & 506 of I.P.C., Police Station Link Road, District Ghaziabad, pending in the court of learned Additional Civil Judge Senior Division-7^th , Ghaziabad within stipulated time.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the present case is pending since 2024 and the same has not culminated to its logical conclusion.

¶11

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the innocuous prayer of the applicant.

¶12

In view of the above, it is directed that the learned trial court concerned shall make all endeavour to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Learned trial court is also directed to frame charges against the accused persons without making any uncessary delay and without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment.

¶13

With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of.

¶14

(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)

¶15

May 12, 2026

¶16

A. Mandhani

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK MANDHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shahzad Rahman v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shahzad Rahman v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

X-Juvenile Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mandeep Singh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Smt. Phool Jahan and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pramod Kumar Tyagi vs State of U.P. and Another

Rama Devi and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Chandra Kala Singh vs State of U.P. and 3 Others