Disposed¶12

Yunish Kumar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC7 May 2026NA529/2285/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expeditious disposal direction; application under S.529 BNSS No. 2285 of 2026; Complaint Case No. 1187 of 2018 under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.; Police Station Tundla, District Firozabad; trial before Civil Judge (F.T.C.), Firozabad; six-month timeline from production of certified copy; no unnecessary adjournments; Yunish Kumar v. State of U.P.; single judge Prashant Mishra-I; application disposed of on May 7, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned trial court to decide Complaint Case No. 1187 of 2018 expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, if there is no legal impediment, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. ¶12

Yunish Kumar vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2285 of 2026

¶2

Yunish Kumar

¶3

.....Applicant(s)

¶4

Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :	Araf Khan, Tauseef Khan G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 84

¶6

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶7

Heard Ms. Sonakshi Arora, learned Advocate holding brief of Mr. Araf Khan, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. representing the State and perused the record.

¶8

The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer for expeditious disposal of Complaint Case No. 1187 of 2018 (Yunish Kumar Vs. State of U.P.), under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., Police Station Tundla, District Firozabad, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (F.T.C.), Firozabad, within stipulated time/ within 15 days.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the present case is pending since long and the same has not culminated to its logical conclusion.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the innocuous prayer of the applicant.

¶11

In view of the above, it is directed that the learned trial court concerned shall make all endeavour to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.

¶12

With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of .

¶13

(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)

¶14

May 7, 2026 Kashifa

¶15

Digitally signed by :- KASHIFA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Yunish Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yunish Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Lilavati Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Smt Upasna Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Arif Khan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Radhika Devi vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Lilavati vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Arif Khan vs State of U.P. and Another