Disposed¶12

Lilavati v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC6 May 2026NA529/2296/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expeditious disposal / speedy trial direction under S. 529 BNSS; Allahabad High Court directed trial court (ACJM-III, Jaunpur) to decide Case No. 23 of 2016 (Lilavati Vs. Prahlad and Others), criminal case under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Sarai Khwaja, District Jaunpur, pending since long, preferably within one year from production of certified copy of the order, if no legal impediment, without unnecessary adjournments; A.G.A. raised no objection; application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned trial court (Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IIIrd, Jaunpur) to decide Case No. 23 of 2016 expeditiously, preferably within one year from the date of production of certified copy of the order, if there is no legal impediment, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. ¶12

Lilavati Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2296 of 2026

¶2

Lilavati

¶3

.....Applicant(s)

¶4

Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 84

¶6

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶7

Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. representing the State and perused the record.

¶8

The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer for expeditious disposal of Case No. 23 of 2016 (Lilavati Vs. Prahlad and Others), under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Sarai Khwaja, District Jaunpur, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IIIrd, Jaunpur, within stipulated time.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the present case is pending since long and the case has not culminated to its logical conclusion.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the innocuous prayer of the applicant.

¶11

In view of the above, it is directed that the learned trial court concerned shall make all endeavour to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.

¶12

With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of.

¶13

(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)

¶14

May 7, 2026 Kashifa

¶15

Digitally signed by :- KASHIFA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Lilavati v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lilavati v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dhanveer Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashok Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dharmendra vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Karmveer Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dhanveer Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Krishna Jaiswal vs State of U.P. and Another