Disposed¶12

Digvijay Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC11 May 2026NA529/2369/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Application U/S 529 BNSS No. 2369 of 2026; Digvijay Yadav v. State of U.P.; expeditious trial direction; speedy disposal; six-month timeline; charge sheet filed 2018, charges not framed; Case No. 46 of 2020; Case Crime No. 180 of 2018; Sections 392, 411 IPC; robbery/stolen property; P.S. Sikarara, Jaunpur; ACJM IInd Jaunpur; no unnecessary adjournments; Prashant Mishra-I, J.; disposed May 12, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned trial court (Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IInd, Jaunpur) to decide Case No. 46 of 2020 expeditiously, preferably within six months from production of certified copy of the order, if there is no legal impediment, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. ¶12

Digvijay Yadav Vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2369 of 2026

¶2

Versus Digvijay Yadav	.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lallan Kumar	Prasad, Mahesh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No.- 84

¶3

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶4

Heard Mr. Lallan Prasad, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. representing the State and perused the record.

¶5

The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer for expeditious disposal of Case No. 46 of 2020 (State Vs. Sonu Harijan and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 180 of 2018, under Sections 392, 411 I.P.C., Police Station Sikarara, District Jaunpur, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IInd, Jaunpur, within stipulated time.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant apprised this Court that charge sheet was filed in the matter in the year 2018 and till date charges have not been framed against the accused persons, which is adversely affecting the interest/rights of the applicant.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the innocuous prayer of the applicant.

¶8

In view of the above, it is directed that the learned trial court concerned shall make all endeavour to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no

¶9

NA529 No. 2369 of 2026

¶10

¶11

legal impediment, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.

¶12