Allahabad High Court — September 2026

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 21015 of 2024 Court No. - 34 (SN.7.2) HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Disposed of . 2. For orders, see our order of date passed in Writ A No. 31077 of 2015 (Gyan Lata Pal vs. State of U.P. and 2 Other

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 51826 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Sri Lalit Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for applicants, Sri Sikandar Raza, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 a

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 52053 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Sri Mukesh Joshi, learned counsel for applicants, Sri Akash Kumar Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Sri Jainendra Kumar

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 52105 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Sri Gaurav Singh Tomar, learned counsel for applicants, Sri Santosh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for opposite party No.2

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 52205 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Mr. Ankit Singh, learned Counsel holding brief of Mr. Gaurav Srivastav, learned Counsel for the applicants, Mr. Mukesh R

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 52193 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Sri Yogesh Kumar Mishra learned counsel for applicants, Sri Dheeraj Kumar Mauraya, Advocate holding brief of Sri Praveen

No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:37915 Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4845 of 2019 Petitioner :- Raju Gangwar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home Lucknow And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Kapil Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. H

Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 429 of 2021 Applicant :- Suman Kumari Opposite Party :- Satendra Kumar,District Basik Education Officer Counsel for Applicant :- Satyendra Chandra Tripathi Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. List has been re

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25886 of 2020 Petitioner :- Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Respondent :- Sri Ram Bahadur And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- U.S. Singh Visen Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jamal Ahmad Khan Hon'ble

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1091 of 1983 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Even in the revised list none has appeared for the appellant. However, learned A.G.A. is present. As per office report, the appellant

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 16 of 1987 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. Vide order dated 23.10.2018 the appeal had already been abated against appellant No.2-Barkannu alias Balram. T

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1665 of 1988 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Learned A.G.A. placed a report before this Court submitted by the In- Charge Inspector, Police Station Kotwali, District Banda. The same

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3124 of 1986 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Even in the revised list none has appeared for the appellant. However, learned A.G.A. is present. As per office report, the sole appe

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 382 of 1988 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Case called out. No one is present for appellant no.1. Learned A.G.A. is present for State. 2. As per office report dated 15.09.2026 base

on 04.08.2026 Judgement delivered on 16.09.2026 A . F. R. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 525 of 1988 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for the i

DELIVERED ON:16.09.2026 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1544 of 1984 Court No. - 90 HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The learned counsel fo

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2834 of 1985 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal. Sri V.D. Ojha, learned State counsel is present, who has b

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 429 of 2021 Court No. - 53 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Sri Harish Chandra Pratap, learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at Bar that the present contempt applicatio

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2266 of 2019 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Case called on. No one is present on behalf of the applicant, even in the revised list. 2. Learned Counsel for opposite party no.2 a

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 437 of 1988 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Case called out. No one is present for appellant. Learned A.G.A. is present for State. 2. As per office report dated 15.09.2026 based on

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5816 of 2020 Court No. - 81 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and the learned Additional Government Advocate for

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6539 of 2019 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Case called on. No one is present on behalf of the applicant, even in the revised list. 2. Learned A.G.A. is present for the State.

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6704 of 2019 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Case called on. No one is present on behalf of the applicant, even in the revised list. 2. Learned A.G.A. is present for the State.

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 11036 of 2021 State of U.P. and two others …..Petitioner(s) Versus Presiding Officer, Labour Court and another …..Respondents(s) Counsel for Petitioners(s) : C.S.C. Counsel for Respondent(s) : Jamal Ah

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27255 of 2019 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today, is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Mahendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and