Rizwan Ali and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 52053 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Sri Mukesh Joshi, learned counsel for applicants, Sri Akash Kumar Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Sri Jainendra Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 and
Disposed 9 months after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 52053 of 2025
Rizwan Ali And 2 Others
| Versus .....Applicant(s) |
|
|---|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Mukesh Joshi |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A., Jainendra Kumar Sharma |
Court No. - 83
HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
- Heard Sri Mukesh Joshi, learned counsel for applicants, Sri Akash Kumar Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Sri Jainendra Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 and learned AGA for the State.
- The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding of Case No.30 of 2014 (State Vs. Mohd. Rizwan and others) arising out of Case crime No.57 of 2013 (F.I.R. No.60 of 2013), U/S- 498A 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., & 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station-Mahila Thana, DistrictMoradabad, pending in the, Court of learned Civil Judge (J.D.) /F.T.C. (CAW) Moradabad in terms of compromise made between the parties.
- Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have amicably settled their dispute out of the Court. Applicants approached this Court by filing this application with prayer to quash the proceedings on terms of compromise entered between the parties, this Court vide order dated 9.3.2026 directed the parties to appear before the trial court for verification of the parties and compromise application. Trial court vide order dated 01.04.2026 verified the parties as well as compromise application. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 compromised the matter and opposite party No.2 does not want to proceed the matter against the applicants. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have settled through
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/52053/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court