Kuldeep Gupta v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
PIL alleging encroachment by respondent no.5. Court noted lack of supporting material such as photographs or duration of encroachment, allowed petitioner time to file it, asked Standing Counsel to obtain instructions on official action, and adjourned listing for 09.12.2025.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3320 of 2025
Kuldeep Gupta
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and 4 others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Diwakar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rajiv Singh (S.C.)
Chief Justice's Court
HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.
- This petition has been filed alleging encroachment by respondent no.5.
- A perusal of the communication dated 09.09.2025 sent by the Commissioner, Meerut Division, Meerut to the Deputy District Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Meerut indicates that the encroachments pertain to constructions of houses and a school, however, no pictures of the offending construction has been produced by the petitioner.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether alleged encroachments by respondent no.5, including houses and a school, can be substantiated and addressed by authorities.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kuldeep Gupta
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Arun Bhansali
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPIL/3320/2025
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court