Ramanand Chauhan v. State of Up and 4 Others
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 81 of 2024
Ramanand Chauhan
.....Petitioner(s)
| Versus | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| State of U.P. and 4 others | .....Resp | ondent(s) | |
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Rajneesh Kumar Mishra |
Singh, Vidit | Narayan |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : Seema Agarwal Manoj Kumar Chaturvedi, Sur Kumar Rai |
(S.C.), Aja Singh, esh Singh, |
y Singh, Somya Vimlesh |
Chief Justice's Court
HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.
- Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has been rendered infructuous.
- In view of the submission made, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Kshitij Shailendra, J.) (Arun Bhansali, CJ.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramanand Chauhan
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Arun Bhansali
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPIL/81/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court