Anticipatory bail application in a cheating/criminal breach of trust FIR; investigation found no useful purpose in custody and applicant undertook to cooperate. Court disposed of the application as infructuous, granting liberty to seek regular bail with the trial court directed to follow Satendra Kumar Antil guidelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:113316
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9797 of 2024
Applicant :- Mohd Israr Khan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ankit Srivastava,Ch. Dil Nisar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ram Kumar Dubey
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
अवगमजमदनतपदसरनदपतवनरसतवकयवजदनवयकगयहह।
आववदक Mohd Israr Khan कदयहअवगमजमदनतआववदनपत 7. तदन स दर, असवलकदरवकयदजदतदहह।
Order Date :- 14.7.2025 CP.sahani
Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of MaharashtraReferred
(2011) 1 SCC 694 · Who else cites this
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, decided on 07.10.2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd Israr Khan
State of U.P.
Ram Kumar Dubey
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
