Dilshana v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J., 7.7.2025; 2025:AHC:105833): anticipatory bail application U/S 482 BNSS No. 3629 of 2025 by Dilshana concerning case no. 85/2020 (stated under Section 304; act name OCR-garbled) — chargesheet already filed; G.A. argued heinous offence with sufficient evidence; Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694 relied_on for anticipatory-bail criteria; merits not gone into; application REJECTED (निरस्त)/dismissed; no relief granted; certified copy ordered to trial court.
What did the court decide?
Keeping in view the settled anticipatory-bail principles invoked from Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694, together with the parties' submissions, the nature of the accusations, the applicant's antecedents and all facts and consequences of the case, and since the chargesheet had already been filed with evidence having been gathered, the court found it improper to accept the application and declined to express any view on the merits.