The petitioner sought appointment in lieu of his father's acquired agricultural property. The Court dismissed the petition, holding no legal provision or scheme confers such a right, relying on a Full Bench decision striking down the earlier scheme.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:17993
Court No. - 17
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1553 of 2024 Petitioner :- Deep Narayan Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Agriculture And Technology Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
Order Date : - 28.2.2024 Subodh/-
Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has a substantive right to appointment in lieu of acquisition of his father's agricultural property?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rabindra Kumar versus District Magistrate, Agra & Anr.Relied on¶7
Rabindra Kumar versus District Magistrate, Agra & Anr. reported in 2004 (4) ESC Allahabad 2354
Deep Narayan Pandey
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Agriculture And Technology Lko. And 3 Others
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
