Compassionate appointment application shown as 'rejected' on portal without reasons. Court directed the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari to decide the applicant's case by a reasoned speaking order within six weeks and asked the department to add a portal column for rejection reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:13982
Court No. - 17
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1170 of 2024
Petitioner :- Abhishek
Respondent :- Basic Shiksha Adhikari, District-Sitapur, And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Jiyauddeen,Anand Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Rishabh Tripathi,C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
Order Date :- 16.2.2024 prabhat
Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the authority must decide petitioner's rejected compassionate appointment application by a reasoned and speaking order.
Abhishek
Basic Shiksha Adhikari, District-Sitapur
Principal Secretary (Basic Education Department), Government of Uttar Pradesh
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
