Nankai Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Higher Education Lko. and 3 Others

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:13356

Court No. - 17

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1080 of 2024

Petitioner :- Nankai Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Higher Education Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Akram Siddiqui,Vimal Kishor Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anurag Kumar Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party No.1 and Mr. Akhilendra Singh Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. Anurag Kumar Singh learned counsel for opposite parties 2 to 4.

¶7

Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for payment of pension by considering temporary service rendered by petitioner as qualifying service for payment of retiral benefits.

¶8

For aforesaid grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned.

¶9

Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. Registrar, Lucknow University, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, same shall be decided within period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.

¶10

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶11

Order Date :- 15.2.2024 prabhat

¶12

Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Nankai v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Higher Education Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nankai v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Higher Education Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Chhote Lal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Urban Developement Lko. and 3 Others

Ram Ji Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Chini Udyog Evam Ganna Vikas and 2 Others

Shashank Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Higher Education, U.P. Lucknow and 3 Others

Smt. Manju Vs the Nagar Ayukt Municipal Commissioner Nagar Nigam Lko. and Another

Manju Yadav @ Manju @ Km Manju Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education Lko. and 3 Others

Rajit Ram Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Gram Vikas Deptt. Lko. and 5 Others