Anticipatory bail application in a case involving POCSO and IPC offences was not pressed on merits. The court refused the relief but directed that if the applicant surrenders within two weeks and applies for regular bail, it be decided expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil, with no coercive action meanwhile.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:198361
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11489 of 2024
Applicant :- Abhishek Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Satyendra Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 18.12.2024/Nitin Verma
Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should the applicant be granted anticipatory bail in a POCSO and IPC case, or should the application be disposed with directions for expeditious regular bail?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherApplied¶7
2021 SCC Online SC 922 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Abhishek
State Of U.P.
Others
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
