Disposed

Yameen v. State of Up and 2 Others

Allahabad HC21 Aug 2024ABAIL/3185/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. arising from a complaint case under Sections 307, 452, 323, 324, 504, 506 and 427 IPC was not pressed on merits; the Court refused the relief but directed expeditious decision of regular bail on surrender within two weeks, with no coercive action meanwhile.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action for two weeks or till surrender, whichever earlier; courts below to decide regular bail application expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil.

Yameen vs State of Up and 2 Others — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:186300

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3185 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Yameen Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Amitrana Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant in Complaint Case No. 18925 of 2023, under Sections 307, 452, 323, 324, 504, 506, 427 IPC, Police Station- Chandpur, DistrictBijnor, till conclusion of trial.

¶8

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

¶10

Accordingly, the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that if applicant surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another , reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶12

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶13

With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 27.11.2024/Aditya

¶15

Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Yameen v. State of Up and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yameen v. State of Up and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Brijesh Kumar Tripathi vs State of U.P. and Another

Krishna Shankar Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Anand Kishor vs State of U.P. and Another

Shyam Singh and 2 Others vs State of Up and Another

Wasim @ Saeed Afsar vs State of U.P.

Vedprakash Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another