Ravi Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants the applicant two weeks' time to file a supplementary affidavit. It directs the office to record the name of the counsel for the opposite party and lists the matter for a fresh hearing. No substantive decision is rendered.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28619 of 2024
Applicant :- Ravi Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vishal Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Satyam Maurya, Shubhashish Shukla,G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Subhashish Shukla, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama today on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record.
Office is directed to show the name of Sri Subhashish Shukla, as counsel for the opposite party no. 2.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks time to file supplementary affidavit in pursuance of the earlier order.
Put up this case as fresh on 04.10.2024.
Order Date :- 13.9.2024 Ishan
Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ravi Kumar
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/28619/2024
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court