Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings was dismissed as the applicants chose not to press the application. The matter was disposed of without substantive adjudication on merits.
Application dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:133681
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22652 of 2024
Applicant :- Rajendra Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd Imran Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Mohd Imran Khan, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
The present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 89499 of 2023 (State Vs. Dilip Kumar and others), arising out of Case Crime No.273 of 2023, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B I.P.C., P.S. Vrindavan, District Mathura as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 21.10.2023, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press the present application.
In view of above, the present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction.
Certified copies of the relevant documents be returned to learned counsel for the applicants after retaining a photocopy of the same.
Order Date :- 20.8.2024 Abhishek Singh
Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajendra Singh And Another
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Abhishek Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
