Applicants sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Sections 323, 504, 506, 308 IPC arising from a Basti FIR. The prayer was refused; counsel withdrew the application with liberty to seek bail before the court below in line with cited Supreme Court decisions on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:136367
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22642 of 2024
Applicant :- Raghvendra Ratan @ Gannu Pandey And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Ratan Pandey,Sunil Kumar Upadhyay
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Heard Sri Santosh Ratan Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri R.K.Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 4839 of 2023 (State vs. Raghvendra Ran @ Gannu Pandey and another), arising out of Case Crime No.675 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 308 IPC, P. S. Kotwali, District Basti as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 03.07.2023, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basti.
Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants is hereby refused.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this application with liberty to file a bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.
In view of the above, this application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to file an appropriate application for bail before the court below in terms of the decisions rendered by the Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 and Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and another, 2022(11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director, 2021 SCC Online SC 941 .
Order Date :- 27.8.2024 MAA/-
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AZAD ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & AnotherRelied on¶11
Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
Siddharth vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and anotherRelied on¶11
Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and another, 2022(11) SCC 676 · Who else cites this
Aman Preet Singh vs. C.B.I. through DirectorRelied on¶11
Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director, 2021 SCC Online SC 941 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Raghvendra Ratan @ Gannu Pandey and 2 others
State of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
