Amrul Nisha Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko and 3 Others

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:14772

Court No. - 17

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1233 of 2024

Petitioner :- Amrul Nisha Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushilendra Kumar Sahu Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shailendra Singh Rajawat

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties no.1 and 2 and Mr. Saurabh Singh, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. S.S. Rajawat, learned counsel for opposite parties no.3 and 4.

¶7

Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for payment of family pension, arrears with effect from January, 2006 to November, 2012.

¶8

For the aforesaid grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation but seeks liberty to file fresh representation before competent authority. At present learned counsel for petitioner restricts his prayer for a final decision with regard to same.

¶9

Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.3 i.e. Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Amethi. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid benefits, actual payment of same shall also be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter.

¶10

With the aforesaid observation, petition stands disposed of .

¶11

Order Date : - 20.2.2024 Subodh/-

¶12

Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Amrul Nisha v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amrul Nisha v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ashutosh Kumar Dwivedi Vs the State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Basic Education, Govt. of U.P. at Lucknow and 3 Others

Rose Tiwari Thru. Her Legal Gaurdian Vinay Tiwari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy., Secondary Education, Lucknow and Others

Ram Nath Pal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Urban Development Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Smt. Priyanka Dwivedi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Secondary Education Lko. and 5 Others

Shivanshi Singh Vs Cenral Board of Secondary Education Thru. Its Regional Officer and Another

Om Prakash Rai Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Sugar Industry Cane Development Deptt. Lko and Another