The petitioner withdrew the writ petition and chose to pursue alternative legal remedies. The court, facing no objection from respondents, disposed of the petition without deciding the substantive grievances raised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36802 of 2022
Petitioner :- Ram Adhar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Pandey,Ram Mani Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Pankaj Kumar Gupta
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Ram Mani Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner after making submissions to some extent states that he does not wish to press the petition and that the petitioner would avail the appropriate legal remedy in respect of the grievances sought to be raised.
Sri L.K. Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Sri Pankaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Gaon Sabha have no objection.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 23.3.2023 Imroz
(Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.)
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD IMROZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Adhar
State Of U.P.
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
