The court dismissed a writ petition concerning land demarcation, observing that the statutory procedure under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 fully addresses the grievance, rendering the petition inapposite.
The petition stands disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate statutory legal remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36838 of 2022
Petitioner :- Santosh And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Krishna Kant Singh,Suresh Chandra Pandey
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard Sri Ashutosh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Pawan Kumar Singh holding brief of Sri Krishna Kant Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Gram Sabha.
Sri Suresh Chandra Pandey seeks to put in appearance by filing an impleadment application on behalf of certain private parties, which is taken on record.
The present petition has been filed seeking to raise a grievance with regard to demarcation of land, which the petitioner claims to be his own.
It is not disputed that for redressal of the aforestated grievance, there is a complete procedure prescribed under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, and in view thereof this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition.
The petition stands disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate statutory legal remedy.
The interlocutory application filed today stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 22.3.2023 Mohini
[Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.]
Digitally signed by :- MOHINI RAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should entertain a petition regarding land demarcation in light of the prescribed procedure under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
Santosh And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
