The petitioner decided not to press the writ petition. The court disposed of the petition accordingly on the advice of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35348 of 2022
Petitioner :- Lok Nath Shukla Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Triveni Shanker,Ajay Shankar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Ajay Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner after making submissions to some extent states that he does not wish to press the petition and that the petitioner would take recourse to the appropriate statutory legal remedy in respect of the grievance sought to be raised.
Sri Anand Bhaskar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents has no objection.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 28.3.2023 Imroz
(Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.)
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD IMROZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Lok Nath Shukla
State Of U P
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
