Disposed

Rudal v. Up Zila Adhkari and 8 Others

Allahabad HC29 May 2023WRIC/17358/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondent to conclude the pending proceedings of an underlying case expeditiously within four months, ensuring full opportunity of hearing to the parties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Up Zila Adhkari to conclude the pending proceedings expeditiously within four months after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties.

Rudal Vs Up Zila Adhkari and 8 Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:119395

¶2

Court No. - 52

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17358 of 2023

¶4

Petitioner :- Rudal Respondent :- Up Zila Adhkari And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti

¶5

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents.

¶7

This petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No. T202105200204704 (Beerpal Vs. Ravindra) within a stipulated period.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pendency of the aforesaid case is causing serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner and therefore this Court should issue a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

In view of the above, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Up-Ziladhikari, Salempur, District Deoria (respondent no.1) to conclude the proceedings of the aforesaid case expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned.

¶11

In case the lawyers do not cooperate with the proceedings either on account of abstainment from work or otherwise, the court concerned shall permit personal appearance of the parties to address it on the merits of the aforesaid case. However, the authority/court concerned shall take special care of the fact that the property rights of the parties may not be adversely affected only on account of non-cooperation of the lawyers and the aforesaid matter shall be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, taking care of the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.

¶12

Order Date :- 29.5.2023 AKShukla/-

¶13

Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rudal v. Up Zila Adhkari and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rudal v. Up Zila Adhkari and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jay Prakash Vs State of U.P. and Another

Nirankar Vs State of U.P. and 12 Others

Ram Chet Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others

Rama Shankar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Jagat Narayan and 18 Others Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Kripa Shankar Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others