Petitioner sought direction to decide execution of a decree. Court refused at this stage due to pending recall application and recent decree, dismissing the writ petition but directing expeditious disposal of the recall.
Writ petition dismissed; recall application before lower court to be decided within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:118188
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16983 of 2023
Petitioner :- Nirankar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Shukla,Amul Kumar Tyagi Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
concerned.
Order Date :- 26.5.2023 Sazia
Digitally signed by :- SAZIA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nirankar
State Of U.P.
Kshitij Shailendra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
