The Court disposed of a writ petition seeking an order for the expeditious disposal of a pending revenue case. It directed the Additional District Magistrate to conclude the proceedings within four months.
Direction to respondent No. 2 to conclude the proceedings of Case No. 37 of 2014 expeditiously within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:118485
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16975 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ram Chet Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mithilesh Kumar,Km. Madhubala Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla
Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
the statutory provisions and after making critical analysis of the material available on record.
Order Date :- 26.5.2023 Sazia
Digitally signed by :- SAZIA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should issue a direction for the expeditious disposal of a pending revenue case.
Whether a specific time-limit for concluding the proceedings of the impugned case should be prescribed.
Whether the impugned proceedings should be conducted strictly in law even in the absence of lawyers.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Chet
State Of U.P.
Kshitij Shailendra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
