The Single Judge noted the jurisdiction that the writ petitioner wished to withdraw the present petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No liberty is granted to file a fresh petition for the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1709 of 2023
Petitioner :- Meer Kumar Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- K.C. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition, and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
It is made clear that no liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition for the same cause of action.
Order Date :- 18.1.2023 S.K.
Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Meer Kumar Maurya
State Of U.P.
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
