Chhavi and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1645 of 2023…
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1645 of 2023…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1645 of 2023
Petitioner :- Chhavi And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rohit Pandey
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for respondentUniversity and learned Standing counsel for the State.
The present petition has been filed with the main prayer:-
"(iii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3 to decide and consider the claim of the petitioners in respect of making self-centre/allotment of their college (respondent no. 4) in their forthcoming examinations."
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners being girl students should be provided their own Institute as Examination Centre. It is next submitted that the examination of petitioner no. 1 is scheduled to be held on 20.1.2023.
Learned counsel for respondent-University contends that in the facts of the present case, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction be issued to respondent no. 3 to look into the grievance of the petitioners.
In view of the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the facts of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation raising all his grievances before respondent no.3-Controller of Examination, Chatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University, Kanpur, within 24 hours along with a copy of this order.
In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.3 shall decide the same by reasoned and speaking order within a period of 24 hours thereafter, after giving opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 18.1.2023 S.K.
Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Chhavi And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court