The High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 as the petitioner failed to bring prima facie material showing that Sudhir Kumar Sharma and Bholu Sharma are the same person. The court declined to express an opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:104917-DB
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16248 of 2023
Petitioner :- Smt. Virma Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Tiwari,Rajesh Kumar Vishwakarma
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
Order Date :- 15.5.2023 SFH
Digitally signed by :- SYED FAHIM HUSAIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Virma Devi
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Kumar Sharma
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
