High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking protection from threats and direction to arrest associates accused of atrocities, holding that legal proceedings are the appropriate remedy.
Writ petition for protection and direction to take legal action against respondents 5 to 9 was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:103362-DB
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16061 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ranadheer Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
"a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing and commanding the respondent authorities to protect the life and property of the Petitioner and his family from the respondents no. 5 to 9 and their associates and also take legal action against the respondents no. 5 to 9 and their associates for causing atrocities to the Petitioner and his family."
Order Date :- 12.5.2023 Ankit.
Digitally signed by :- ANKIT VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the authorities to protect them from threatened atrocities.
Whether the High Court should issue directions for legal action against the accused.
Ranadheer
State Of U.P.
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
