In this writ petition, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad directed the respondent judicial officer to decide a pending civil case within three months. The writ petition was disposed of on merits.
Direct respondent No. 2 to decide Case No. 01254/2021 by a reasoned order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10866 of 2023
Petitioner :- Arjun Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Kant Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Gupta
Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Chandra Kant Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Pankaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3.
The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking mandamus, directing the respondent No. 2 to decide the Case No. 01254/2021 (Arjun and others Vs. Hardev and others) (Computer Case No. T202117650101254) within stipulated period.
The case has been pending for quite some time.
In view of the above, the respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the Case No. 01254/2021 (Arjun and others Vs. Hardev and others) (Computer Case No. T202117650101254) by a reasoned and speaking order on merit expeditiously, preferably, within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(Prashant Kumar, J.)
Order Date :- 3.4.2023 Jaswant
Digitally signed by :- JASWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondent judicial officer to decide the pending case expeditiously?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arjun
State of U.P.
Other Respondent
Other Respondent 4
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
