Criminal Misc. Bail Application filed in 2019 for anticipatory bail was listed three times in 2023 without appearance. The court dismissed it as infructuous citing excessive delay and lack of applicant interest, vacating any interim protection.
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim protection vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:165486
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 55027 of 2019
Applicant :- Rajendra And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gyan Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 17.8.2023 Vikas
[Krishan Pahal, J.]
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the long-pending anticipatory bail application filed in 2019 should be allowed or dismissed due to inaction and efflux of time.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on¶7
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. GopalRelied on¶7
Ishwarlal Mali Rathod v. Gopal, (2021) 12 SCC 612 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajendra and 2 Others
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
Vikas Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
